Monday, March 28, 2016

Easily save the images you love...now on desktop

At the end of last year, we announced the ability to save images directly from Google’s image search in your mobile browser. Today, we’re making it easier to stay organized across more devices: now, you can save images to Google from your desktop.


For example, if your yard is in need of some spring re-planting, just go to your desktop, search for an image and tap the star to save your potential new flowers, bushes, or even swimming pools. When you’re at the store ready to start buying, you’ll be able to pull up your saved images on your phone and start building your perfect yard. You can also tag your saves to keep them organized.


This feature is currently available in the US when you search for images on desktop and in your mobile browser. To try it out, make sure you’re logged into your browser with your Google Account; then you can start image searching and saving.

We’re aiming to make what you search for and save more useful, so start saving to Google and let us know what you think about today’s update.

Post Content

Digital transformation: are you asking the right questions?

Twitter turned 10 last week. This post isn’t about Twitter, but it made me realise how long I’d been working in the social media field (it’ll be nine years next week).


I’m reasonably convinced I got my first social role because I just happened to be doing social when the whole thing became popular. This happens a lot in marketing. Something new comes along and we all hop on board, until everyone is doing it and it’s gradually subsumed by another area of marketing. In Twitter’s case a slightly wonky mix of PR and CRM.


Digital transformation is probably the biggest of those ‘new, shiny things’ to hit the marketing world in the past five years, and it’s unusual in that it actually attempts to connect marketing up with other parts of the business.


It has become the teenage sex of the digital world; Everyone is talking about it, but you’re never quite sure how far anyone has really gone. Hundreds of articles and whitepapers now exist (I wrote a few of them myself), focused on the three key areas of DT: people, processes and technology.


As with social media though, there comes a point when people start to realise that, hey, maybe we should have a clear goal in mind here?


A great deal of resource is being put into transformation projects, some are successful, but in a lot of cases they are slightly disjointed. Getting the new tech is probably the easiest part. Putting the new processes in is time-consuming but can be done with regular training and a step-change approach.


The people part is probably most difficult, because it not only requires new skills, but often a cultural change as well.


And here’s the rub. The differentiation that makes companies into successful digital enterprises.


As an example, let’s have a look at Barclays.


Barclays_Pingit


Image via VisMedia


Barclays has invested heavily in digital, with a multichannel and multi-platform approach. And just so you know this isn’t me slighting the company, it has done a very good job. I can now easily access my finances via any device; I rarely need to visit a branch. I no longer receive paper updates, and I can easily send payments directly from my phone. Services and resources are delivered successfully in a variety of formats.


But there is a gap. And in the case of financial services it has allowed a new wave of digital-first fintech enterprises to fill a gap in the market.


Companies like ZhongAn, Wealthfront, Klarna and Ebury. All have something in common. They all offer fast, tailored solutions. And tailoring means you are forced to really dig into your available customer data, and act on it quickly.


Traditional business structures exist for a reason. They allow any given business to deliver its services to the customer in at least a semi-acceptable fashion. But too often when we approach digital transformation, our goals are to expand on existing business, rather than exploit new opportunities.


We are using digital to deliver our services in a more efficient way, but that doesn’t mean the services themselves are actually better.


Customer-centricity is a term that gets bandied around a lot, and personally I believe it’s largely a result of culture. Actually caring about what you are doing and what people think of it goes a long way. And that isn’t to say that businesses attempting to transform themselves don’t care. Only that their focus is often on the wrong thing.


Size has something to do with this. Start-ups in particular do have certain luxuries available to them. If I start a business then I can, within reason, cherry-pick the exact tools I want to run my business, and hire the people I feel are the best fit to help me run it. People who already have ideal skill-sets. But much of this can be offset by investment, so it has to come down to attitude.


According to Cisco research, some 45% of businesses have boards that are not concerned with digital disruption.


In finance in particular this seems to be compounded. Research suggests that a majority of senior banking execs have not even heard of the biggest fintech startups, let alone become concerned about them.



In short, they see no reason to change.


But the startups of this world know that they are no longer dealing with single-channel audiences who insist on having their emails printed out. Services need to be delivered easily across multiple interfaces, in line with customer intent. They have to find out what a new type of customer wants, and give it to them quickly.


Conversely, they also have the luxury of time. If you are starting from scratch, then there’s plenty of room to prototype products, test them, launch MVPs and reiterate.


Businesses that are dealing with an existing model have none of this. They have busy people who are already struggling with deadlines. Who has time to take a step back and really think about how services are delivered? This becomes compounded where there’s a focus on short-term bottom line. It takes a rare individual to stand in front of the board and say with confidence: We are going to lose money for the next six months. But after that our income will increase dramatically.


This kind of leadership seems to be sadly lacking in many sectors, but there is evidence that things are changing. The best digital leaders tend to have a few common traits and chief among them is the being able to see value in unexplored areas.


A few years ago I had a conversation where I was told vociferously that Twitter could not make any money for my business. Because there is nowhere to input credit card details on Twitter. That’s an extreme case, and I hope, one that’s changed (Incidentally, Twitter brought in just shy of a million pounds in that particular year) as these new types of business leader have come to prominence.


It doesn’t always involve the type of full pivot that many startups take. I do not expect Barclays to turn into Uber at any point, but it does involve really understanding customer feedback at speed, and at scale.


There are so many factors in play here that this is threatening to turn into a novel already, but I think the key consideration here is that when implementing new processes, tools – and yes, people – it should all be done with one eye on the customer. Data and anecdotal evidence from user tests should be constantly collected and used.


Digital transformation is about making your business fit for purpose so whether you are setting goals or already implementing, don’t be afraid to start afresh. Digital should improve your services, but first ask yourself: Are these the services my customer really needs?


This article was originally published on our sister site ClickZ. We’re republishing a handful of their recent articles over the Bank Holiday weekend. Go give them some love.


Want to know more about the challenges and benefits of digital transformation? Make sure you check out Shift, our new event in London this May.

Google Announces AdWords Redesign by @dantosz

On Monday morning, via their AdWords blog, Google announced they are beginning a major redesign of the AdWords platform for "marketing in a mobile-first world". This update will occur over the rest of 2016 and into 2017.

The post Google Announces AdWords Redesign by @dantosz appeared first on Search Engine Journal.

18 Tweetable Traffic Building Tips to Start Using Today!

tweetable-traffic-building-tipsEarlier this year we have started a new initiative sending our newsletter subscribers regular actionable traffic generation tips


Subscribe to that list here and receive regular tips as well!


To collect more input and inspiration I reached out to the industry peers to learn their most effective traffic building tips!


I got 18 tips worth sharing with the world!


1. Get busy on Pinterest. Just like SEO, only tastier! Brings long term traffic, and builds over time. What more do you need.




Get busy on Pinterest. Just like SEO, only tastier! ~@madlemmingzClick To Tweet

(By Ashley Faulkes @madlemmingz)


Further reading: Pinterest Tips and Tricks for your Website


2. Stop thinking content and start thinking value. Yet another list of 10 ways to do something doesn’t give any value.




Stop thinking content and start thinking value ~@Texterra_engClick To Tweet

(By Tim Fehraydinov @Texterra_eng)


Further reading: How to Rank Higher in Google


3. Go visual and respect the time of the reader. Life is too short to read boring and repetitive introductions, and the phrase “check it out” basically kills the post as it doesn’t sound motivating.


On the other hand, an interesting picture going with an accurate headline are always catchy, makes want for more and maybe even to subscribe for later news.




An interesting picture going with an accurate headline are always catchy~@jone_vasaitisClick To Tweet

(By @jone_vasaitis)


Further reading: 20 Sites to Diversify Your Visual Marketing


4. Interview an online influencer and get them to promote it via their social media channels and any other means they have




Interview an online influencer and get them to promote it via their social media channel ~@BrightonCormacClick To Tweet

(By Cormac Reynolds @BrightonCormac)


Further reading: How to Get Your Expert Interview Retweeted Like Crazy


5. Optimise page title and meta description for highest CTR. It’s not enough just to appear in the SERPS – people need to click!




Optimise page title and meta description for highest CTR ~@timfelClick To Tweet

(By Tim Felmingham @timfel)


Further reading: How to Optimize Title Tags for Higher Rankings and Better Click-Through #JimAndAnn


6. Combine power of Content (great topics, in-depth), SEO (keywords, backlinks), Social (be everywhere, network) for traffic building




Combine power of Content, SEO, Social for more traffic ~@RtMixMktgClick To Tweet

(By Tom Treanor @RtMixMktg)


Further reading: 5 Steps To An Integrated Approach To SEO-Friendly Content Marketing


7. Blog commenting is great to build traffic. Post indepth comments on high-authority blogs in your industry!




Blog commenting is great to build traffic. Post indepth comments on high-authority blogs ~@ErikEmanuelliClick To Tweet

(By @ErikEmanuelli)


Further reading: How Commenting May Help You Build Your Credibility And Traffic For Your Blog


8. Spend time writing a headline which people can’t help but click! After reading the headline people should be excited to read your article!




Spend time writing a headline which people can't help but click! ~@zenagencyClick To Tweet

(By @zenagency)


Further reading: How to (Try to) Write a Perfect Headline


9. Collaborate on content with industry peers for them to then help you promote it!




Collaborate on content with industry peers for them to then help you promote it! ~@roxanasoiClick To Tweet

Examples:



  • Write an article based on questions that get most engagement in a community and share it with members 1-on-1 on social media.

  • Open a thread in a group and ask people their favorite practices + why they do it. Gather answers, write article, share it w/ them.

  • Publish reviews/content where you mention several brands. Share with each brand and invite to share w/ their community.

  • Contribute on a trending topic on a major website. Create amazing content/visuals that are shareable. Don’t be afraid to speak your mind.

  • Create a bridge between communities you’re active on (i.e. @myblogu) & those you own, so users engage with each other and share content.


(By Roxana Nasoi @roxanasoi)


Further reading: 8 Collaboration Tools to Improve Your Content


10. Make a list of best blog posts on a particular topic. Don’t be shy to use the content of your competitors.




Make a list of best blog posts on a particular topic. ~@JaneKryukovaClick To Tweet

(By @JaneKryukova)


Further reading: How to Get Traffic and Links from Blog Roundups


11. Be helpful. I contribute to multiple forums and provide answers to questions when I can. I receive hundreds of site visits through signature links each month from doing so. You can as well.




Be helpful. Contribute to multiple forums & provide answers to questions ~@MediaWyseClick To Tweet

(By Casey Markee @MediaWyse)


Further reading: 6 Ways to Get Traffic from Forums to Your Website


12. Use keywords with search volume that already rank. Find them with @Searchmetrics & @SEMRush or @Spyfu. Optimize with @Moz Grader




Use keywords with search volume that already rank. Find them w/ @Searchmetrics, @SEMRush, @Spyfu ~@LukaszZeleznyClick To Tweet

(By @LukaszZelezny)


Further reading: 3 Awesome Free Keyword Research Tools


13. Schedule social shares throughout the month for new posts




Schedule social shares throughout the month for new posts ~@duggansaraClick To Tweet

(By Sara Duggan @duggansara)


Further reading: How to Promote a Blog Post on Social Media


14. Be relative to the question, if you want to be chosen as the one to answer it. Keywords still count!




Be relative to the question, if you want to be chosen as the one to answer it ~@DonSturgillClick To Tweet

(By @DonSturgill)


Further reading: Basic 101Beginner’s Guide to SEO


15. Give value and engage at every opportunity. It makes people curious for more.




Give value and engage at every opportunity. It makes people curious for more. ~@SeegerNClick To Tweet

(By Nancy Seeger @SeegerN)


Further reading: Social Media 101


16. Share your content where your fan base is mostly active (for me it’s Twitter and DeviantART). Tag/mention people and use hashtags!




Share your content where your fan base is mostly active ~@luanatfClick To Tweet

(By Luana Spinetti @luanatf)


Further reading:


17. Share your content more than once, esp through Twitter and Reddit. Be sure to mix up you hashtags to reach new audiences




Share your content more than once, esp through Twitter and Reddit ~@EdwinDearbornClick To Tweet

(By @EdwinDearborn)


Further reading: 7 Different Ways To Re-Package Your Tweets


18. Smile when you write. People are drawn to smiles, and it does come out in your writing.




Smile when you write. People are drawn to smiles, and it does come out in your writing ~@amabaieClick To Tweet

(By David Leonhardt @amabaie)


Further reading: 52 more signs that you might be a writer


Are there any tweetable traffic tips you’d like to share? Post them in the comments!


The post 18 Tweetable Traffic Building Tips to Start Using Today! appeared first on Internet Marketing Ninjas Blog.




Are Keywords Really Dead? An Experiment

Posted by sam.nemzer

[Estimated read time: 6 minutes]

A quantitative analysis of the claim that topics are more important than keywords.

What’s more important: topics or keywords? This has been a major discussion point in SEO recently, nowhere more so than here on the Moz blog. Rand has given two Whiteboard Fridays in the last two months, and Moz’s new Related Topics feature in Moz Pro aims to help you to optimize your site for topics as well as keywords.

The idea under discussion is that, since the Hummingbird algorithm update in 2013, Google is getting really good at understanding natural language. So much so, in fact, that it's now able to identify similar terms, making it less important to worry about minor changes in the wording of your content in order to target specific keyword phrases. People are arguing that it’s more important to think about the concepts that Google will interpret, regardless of word choice.

While I agree that this is the direction that we're heading, I wanted to see how true this is now, in the present. So I designed an experiment.

The experiment

The question I wanted to answer was: “Do searches within the same topic (but with different keyword phrases) give the same result?” To this end, I put together 10 groups of 10 keywords each, with each group’s keywords signifying (as closely as possible) the same concept. These keywords were selected in order to represent a range of search volume, and across the spectrum of informational to transactional. For example, one group of keywords are all synonymous the phrase "cheapest flight times" (not-so-subtly lifted from Rand’s Whiteboard Friday):


  • cheapest flight times

  • cheapest time for flights

  • cheapest times to fly

  • cheap times for flights

  • cheap times to fly

  • fly at cheap times

  • time of cheapest flights

  • what time of day are flights cheapest

  • what time of day to fly cheaply

  • when are flights cheapest


I put the sample of 100 keywords through a rank-tracking tool, and extracted the top ten organic results for each keyword.

Then, for each keyword group, I measured two things.


  1. The similarity of each topic’s SERPs, by position.

    • For example, if every keyword within a group has the same page ranking no. 2, that result will score 10. If 9 results are the same and one is different, nine results will get a score of 9, and the other will score 1.

    • This score is then averaged across all 100 (10 results * 10 keywords) results within each topic. The highest possible score (every SERP identical) is 10, the lowest possible (every result different) is 1.


  2. The similarity of each topic’s SERPs, by all pages that rank (irrespective of position).

    • As above, but scoring each keyword’s results by the number of other keywords that contain that result anywhere in the top 10 results. If a result appears in the top 10 for all keywords in a topic group, it scores a 10, even if the results in the other keywords’ SERPs are in different positions.

    • Again, the score is averaged across all results in each topic, with 10 being the highest possible and 1 the lowest.


Results

The full analysis and results can be seen in this Google Sheet.


This chart shows the results of the experiment for the 10 topic groups. The blue bars represent the by position score, averaged across each topic group, and the red bars show the average all pages score.

The most striking thing about this is the wide range of results that can be seen. Topic group D’s keywords are 100% identical if you don’t take ordering into account, whereas group J only has 38% crossover of results between keywords.

We can see from this that targeting individual keywords is definitely not a thing of the past. For most of the topic groups, the pages that rank in the top 10 have little consistency across different wordings of the same concepts. From this we can assume that the primary thing making one page rank where another does not, is matching exact keywords.

Why is there such variation?

If we look into what factors might be affecting the varying similarities between the different topic groups, we could consider the following factors:


  • Searcher intent: Informational (Know) vs Transactional (Do) topics.

  • Topics with high competition levels.

Searcher intent

Although Google’s categorisation of searches into do, know and go can be seen as a false trichotomy, it can still be useful as a simplistic model to classify searcher intent. All of the keyword groups I used can be classed as either informational or transactional.

If we break up our topic groups in this way, we can see the following:

As you can see, there's no clear difference between the two types. In fact the highest and lowest groups (D and J) are both transactional.

This means that we can’t say — based on this data, at least — that there’s any link between the search intent of a topic and whether you should focus on topics over keywords.

Keyword Difficulty

Another factor that could be correlated with similarity of SERPs is keyword difficulty. As measured by Moz’s keyword difficulty tool, this is a proxy for how strong the sites that rank in a SERP are, based on their Page Authority and Domain Authority.

My hypothesis here is that, for searches where there are a lot of well-established, high-DA sites ranking, there will be less variation between similar keywords. If this is the case, we would expect to see a positive correlation in the data.


This is not borne out by the data. The higher the keyword difficulty is across the keywords in a topic group, the less similarity there is between SERPs within that topic group. This correlation is fairly weak (R2=0.28), so we can’t draw any conclusions from this data.

One other factor that could explain the lack of pattern in this result is that 100 keywords in 10 groups is a fairly small sample size, and is subject to variation in the selection of keywords to go into each group. It is impossible to perfectly control how "close" in definition the keywords in each group are.

Also, it may just be the case that Google simply understands some concepts better than others. This would mean it can see some synonyms as being very closely related, whereas for others it's still perplexed by the variations, so looks for specific words within the content of each page.

Conclusion

So does this mean that we should or shouldn't ignore Rand when he tells us to forget about keywords and focus on topics? Somewhat unsatisfyingly, the answer is a strong "maybe."

While for some search topics there's a lot of variation based on the exact wording of the keywords, for others we can see that Google understands what users mean when they search and sees variations as equivalent. The key takeaway from this? Both keywords and topics are important.

You should still do keyword research. Keyword research is always going to be essential. But you should also consider the bigger picture, and as more tools that allow you to use natural language processing become available, take advantage of that to understand the overall topics you should write about, too.

It may be a useful exercise to carry out this type of analysis within your own vertical, and see how well Google can tell apart the similar keywords you want to target. You can then use this to inform how exact your targeting should be.

Let me know what you think, and if you have any questions, in the comments.


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!

Sunday, March 27, 2016

15 Unexpected Ways to Use Content to Drive Results by @IAmAaronAgius

If you're serious about content marketing, you can't just write a blog post and call it a day. Here are 15 unexpected ways to use content to drive results.

The post 15 Unexpected Ways to Use Content to Drive Results by @IAmAaronAgius appeared first on Search Engine Journal.

Saturday, March 26, 2016

Why You Need to Find All Your NAP Variations Before Building Local Citations - Whiteboard Friday

Posted by Whitespark

[Estimated read time: 6 minutes]

Citation consistency got you down? It's one of the most important local search ranking factors, but it can be an overwhelming task to find inconsistencies, and it's often easy to create accidental duplicate listings. In today's guest Whiteboard Friday, Darren Shaw, founder of Whitespark and recent speaker at MozCon Local, outlines a foolproof way to discover all your NAP variations to prepare for proper citation building.

Why You Need to Find all Your NAP Variations Before Building Local Citations Whiteboard

Click on the whiteboard image above to open a high resolution version in a new tab!

Video Transcription

Hey there, Moz fans, I'm Darren Shaw from Whitespark, and I'm here today to talk to you about why you need to find all of your NAP variations before building local citations. It's an important topic to cover because citation consistency is one of the most important local search ranking factors. In last year's local search ranking factor study, it was ranked the number two most important factor, second only to just actually having a business in the city you're trying to rank.

Before I get into it, I want to cover a couple of definitions really quickly. So NAP stands for name, address, and phone number. A citation is basically a mention of your name, address, and phone number somewhere on the Web. Typically you're going to see that on sites like YellowPages.com or Yelp.com or Superpages, but you can find them on any kind of sites like blogs, newspaper, whatever. Anywhere your name is mentioned, that's a citation.

I want to illustrate a mistake we see happening all the time in citation building. I'm going to show you an example here.

Bob is a lawyer.


He wants to figure out how he can rank in the local pack.


So he does a little research. He comes across an article on how to rank in local SEO. He reads about citations and how that can help with his local rankings. The article suggests that he uses the local citation finder to research his competitors and find citation opportunities. So he's done that. He's got his list, and he's off to submit his business to all the various directories.

He goes to YellowBiznass.com, and he's thinking, well, maybe I already have a listing there.


So he searches for his phone number, doesn't find anything. He thinks he's all in the clear so he creates a listing.

This is the mistake he's made. He didn't realize, he didn't think about the fact that he already had a citation because he used to use his old cell number for his business. If he had searched for his cell number, he would have found the old listing on the site. So now he's created this problem where he's got an old, incorrect listing on the site, and he's created a duplicate listing. So he's created a citation consistency problem, and it's not really helping him to rank well.

We solve this problem in our Whitespark citation services with this four-step process to find all the different NAP variations.

How to find NAP variations

Step one, we ask the business: Tell us about any previous business names that you've had, if you've changed your name in the past or if you have a corporate account. How about any addresses? Have you moved locations? Do you have any secondary locations? Do you have your business registered at a corporate address? Phone numbers? Any call tracking numbers, toll-free numbers, cell numbers, any past numbers that you've used for the business? This is a great way to start. We get a list of all that stuff.


Next, we'll go to Moz Local and we run a search for the business name and ZIP. This, because Moz Local queries all the primary data aggregators and a number of other important sites in the local search ecosystem, it tends to surface a lot of NAP variations. So we use this to add to our list.


Third, we'll go to YellowBot and MerchantCircle. These two sites are interesting because they collect data from a number of different sources, but they don't do a very good job of merging listings as the data comes in. So we end up with a lot of duplicates on the site. It's a lot of work to clean up that site, but it's very helpful for this process.


So for this one, you just put in a portion of the business name. Bob's business is Bob Loblaw's Law Firm. Instead of just putting the whole thing in, we'll just put in Loblaw to help surface variations. Here are some variations that might come up. We've got Loblaw and Sons LLC, Loblaw's Law, and Bob Loblaw's Law Blog.

After we get that, we're going to go to Google. We're going to search Google. Now what we're doing here is we're trying to find any variations that we didn't already discover. We already have a number of different names. We have a number of different phone numbers. What we'll do is we're going to find more names. If you put in a phone number for the business and you exclude all the names, Google's going to surface any sites or any pages that mention that phone number without any of these names. That helps you to surface any variations that you weren't aware of. You do that for each phone number.


Then on the phone number side, if we're trying to find more phone numbers, we'll search for the business name and exclude the phone numbers we already know of. By excluding phone numbers we already know of, we might find new names.


The one trouble with this one is it tends to surface a lot of pages where you just mention the business without the phone number, and that's a common thing. So what I do in this case is I scan the results looking for obvious business directories, if it's like a Yelp or a Foursquare or anything like that. I'm looking for business directories in these results.

Then we want to see if there are any other addresses we missed. Put in the phone number and exclude the addresses that you're already aware of. Do that for each phone number.


An important tip here with the addresses is that you don't want to use the full address. Let's say for example your address is 5329 Saddleback Road South, Suite 705. Don't put in the whole thing. You put that in quotes, it's only going to match pages that are an exact match with that. Just put in that portion that's going to be common to all the sites, like 5329 Saddleback.


At the end of this process, you should have a very nice, clean list of all of your various names, addresses, and phone numbers for the business.

Now you're ready to build citations.

All you have to do at this point is just make sure that you check all NAP variations on the site before you submit a listing.

There are two ways to do that. One, you can use the site search feature to search by name and/or phone number. You're going to run all those, but you can't always rely on this. Some of the sites have a really crummy search feature. It doesn't work very well.

We always double check by running a number of Google searches as well. You'll use the site colon operator in Google. You'll go site:local.com space and put it in quotes, so phone one, phone two, name one, name two, address one.


You're going to go through all of the different variations that you're aware of. At the end of that if you found a listing, you want to claim it and update it. If you didn't find a listing, then you're clear to submit. This way, you'll be creating citations without worrying about creating duplicate listings.

That's everything. I hope it's been helpful. I want to say a big thanks to Nyagoslav Zhekov who helped me organize all this information and a big thanks to Moz for having me. If you have any questions, please leave them in the comments. Thanks very much.


Video transcription by Speechpad.com


Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!